Wikipedia:Txokoa

Ongi etorri euskarazko Wikipediako txokora!

Orri hau Wikipedia honetako mota guztietako hizketaldi eta galderetarako da. Hala ere, orri jakin bati buruz edo beste wikilari batekin eztabaidatzeko, erabil ezazu orri horren edo wikilari horren eztabaida orria; Txokoa hainbat orriri eragiten dioten eztabaida orokorretarako da.

Wikipedian berria bazara, hobe duzu lehenik eta behin maiz egiten diren galderak irakurtzea.

Eztabaida zaharrak:
Wikipedia:Txokoa/Artxiboa

---

ES: Si no comprende o no sabe escribir en nuestra lengua y desea comunicarse con nosotros y nosotras, por favor, acuda a la Embajada.
FR: Si vous ne comprenez pas ou ne savez pas écrire dans notre langue et souhaitez communiquer avec nous, s'il vous plaît, visitez l'Ambassade.
EN: If you do not understand or you cannot write in our language, and you want to tell us something, please, visit the Embassy.
DE: Wenn Sie unsere Sprache nicht verstehen oder nicht schreiben können und Sie bei uns mitreden möchten, dann besuchen Sie bitte die Botschaft.m,mll.pl

Kaixo denei,

Ez dakit zein den "Queso en grano"-rako itzulpen zuzena, gazta-aleak edo ale-gazta. Iritzi bat baduzu, eman. Milesker.

Gauza bere ingelesez Cheese curds quebecekoa eta curd cheese artean.

Nire ustez, alea ez dago ondo hor, "Pikor" edo harengandik eratorrikoren bat: "Pikorta", "Pikortsu"... erabili beharko ltzateke. OEHn zenbait adibide daude.

Beraz ongi ulertu badut eta OEHn egiazta daiteke.

--- gazta pikor = ''grain/crotte de fromage = grano de queso = curd cheese''

aitzitik interneten ezer aurkitu ez dudanez, zein da itzulpen onena ''fromage en grain = Queso en grano = cheese curd'' adibide hauentzat: Pikorrezko gazta edo pikor-gazta edo beste bat ?

Egia esan, ez dakit zehatz mehatz nolako gazta den, baina hauetako bat erabili beharko litzateke: Gazta pikorkatu, gazta pikorta, gazta pikortadun, gazta pikortatsu edo gazta pikortsu zein motako gazta den. Ez dira, nire ustez, gauza bera, beraz, OEHn begiratu gazta horri zein den hobetoen datorkion adjektiboa. Dena den, Queso en grano, nire ustez, gazta pikortsua.

Ez dut uste "gazta pikortsua" itzulpen egokia denik: nire ustez, horrek esan nahi du pikorren kontsistentzia duela, Parmigianoak bezala, adibidez. Eroskik "café en grano" euskaraz "kafe aleak" jartzen du, eta onargarria da "ale" hitza logikoa delako kafearekin; gaztarekin ez, ordea, ez baita normala izan holako gazta motarik gurean. Seguruenik, "gazta-pikorrak" itzulita hobe dago.

Idatzi nuen bezala, gazta pikorrak = ''grains/crottes de fromage = granos de queso = curd cheese''

Baina euskarara ''fromage en grain'' itzuli behar badut zer den, "ale formako gazta" bezala itzuliko nuke, hau da, gazta pikorretatik desberdina dena. Izan ere, kafea ez bezala, alea ez da naturala, ale itxurako materiala baizik.

Ez dakit ea ''gazta pikortsua'' itzulpen egokiena den, baina ''fromage en grain''k ere ez dut uste ''gazta pikorra'' zuzen itzultzen duenik

Hasteko, "ale" hitza baino askoz zehatzagoa iruditzen zait "pikorra" erabiltzea. Bestetik, Euskaltermen begiratzen baduzu, gaztelaniazko I+prep+I sintagma batzuk ("café en grano" tankerakoak") badaude, Terminologia Batzordearen 4. ponderazio-markarekin, hau da, erabaki "ofiziala" da. Begiratu, adibidez, "Cacao en grano" ("kakao-aleak": "aleak", bai, baina kontuan izan kakaoaren forma naturala alea dela; "gazta-alea"-ren neurria, berriz, ez da argia, uler daiteke "unidad" zentzuan). Edo "café en polvo" (kafe-hautsa). Jarraitzen dut esaten "Gazta-pikorrak" dela itzulpenik egokiena, "gaztazko pikorrak" esan nahi baitu, zalantzarik gabe. "Alea" hitza, berriz, esan bezala, anbiguoa da testuinguru honetan.

Eta zer pentsatzen duzu hori buruz ''Pikor-formako gazta'', disko-formako hilarria edo Ilargi-formako hezurra bezala. Argi izatearen meritua behintzat badu, anbiguotasunik gabe.

Ez dut uste terminologikoki zuzena denik, gaztak pikor forma duela esan nahi baitu eta kontzeptualki arraroa iruditzen zait; "queso en grano" terminoarekin gazta kopuru bat hainbat pikorretan "apurtuta" saltzen dela esaten da. "Gazta-pikorrak" ez bazaizu gustatzen, "Gaztazko pikorrak" agian gehiago gustatuko zaizu, ez dakit.

Gustatzen zaidana edo ez, galdera ez da. "Le fromage en grain" (''gazta-pikorrak'') eta "les grains de fromage" (''gazta pikorrak'') bereizi nahi nituen euskaraz, bereizketa hori frantsesez egiten delako. Ez naiz aditua euskaraz, alderantziz.

Aupa, lagun. Oraingoan, garbi ikusi dut zein den aldea. Elian, Elhuyarren itzultzaile automatikoan, sartuz gero, honela itzultzen ditu: "fromage en grain" = pikor-gazta; "grains de fromage" = gazta-aleak. Poztuko nintzateke zerbaitetarako balio baldin badizu. Ongi izan.

Kaixo! Zerrenda majoa dugu artikulu nabarmenduen bozketan, baina ez badu jendeak parte hartzen, ezin da ezer ere nabarmendu. Mesedez, parte hartu!

Argi dago. Orain ageriago udan. Wikipediaren mantentze lanak denbora, ahalegina eta tinkotasuna eskatzen ditu, eta egiten dena ez da inon ikusten. Berdin Nabarmenduak hautatzeko orduan. Askoren lankidetza behar da: testua aztertzea, behar izanez gero zuzenketak egitea eta bozkatzea.

Eta udan gaudenez, inork eragozpenik jartzen ez badu nahikoa bozka jaso ez dituztenei bozketa epea luzatuko zaie

Kaixo! Aspaldi egin genituen udalerri askoren artikuluak, eta orokorrean ondo kategorizatu genituen. Baina beste herrialde batzuetan badaude bestelako antolaketak, eta kakanahaste handia dugula uste dut. Gune populatuak (hiri, udalerri, herri, auzo, etxalde... edo dena delakoa) hobeto antolatzeko laguntza beharko litzateke. Eta sistematikoki egin. Norbait animatzen da ingelesezko Wikipediako kategorizazioarekin sartu eta gurean antzeko zerbait egiteko?

Aupa, lagunok! Norbaitek esaten badit zer eta nola egin, ahaleginduko nintzateke nire aletxoa jartzen.

Ba metodikoki kategoriak sortu eta GUZTIA berkategorizatu. Ez dakit egingarria den ere.

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.

Hizkuntza gehiago • Mesedez, lagun gaitzazu zure hizkuntzara itzultzen

Hi all,

Volunteers in the 2022 Board of Trustees election are invited to vote for statements to use in the Election Compass. You can vote for the statements you would like to see included in the Election Compass on Meta-wiki.

An Election Compass is a tool to help voters select the candidates that best align with their beliefs and views. The community members will propose statements for the candidates to answer using a Lickert scale (agree/neutral/disagree). The candidates’ answers to the statements will be loaded into the Election Compass tool. Voters will use the tool by entering in their answer to the statements (agree/disagree/neutral). The results will show the candidates that best align with the voter’s beliefs and views.

Here is the timeline for the Election Compass:

• July 8 - 20: Volunteers propose statements for the Election Compass
• July 21 - 22: Elections Committee reviews statements for clarity and removes off-topic statements
• July 23 - August 1: Volunteers vote on the statements
• August 2 - 4: Elections Committee selects the top 15 statements
• August 5 - 12: candidates align themselves with the statements
• August 15: The Election Compass opens for voters to use to help guide their voting decision

The Elections Committee will select the top 15 statements at the beginning of August

Best,

Movement Strategy and Governance

This message was sent on behalf of the Board Selection Task Force and the Elections Committee

MNadzikiewicz (WMF) 23:01, 27 uztaila 2022 (CEST)

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.

Hizkuntza gehiago • Mesedez, lagun gaitzazu zure hizkuntzara itzultzen

Hi everyone,

The Affiliate voting process has concluded. Representatives from each Affiliate organization learned about the candidates by reading candidates’ statements, reviewing candidates’ answers to questions, and considering the candidates’ ratings provided by the Analysis Committee. The selected 2022 Board of Trustees candidates are:

• Tobechukwu Precious Friday (Tochiprecious)
• Farah Jack Mustaklem (Fjmustak)
• Shani Evenstein Sigalov (Esh77)
• Kunal Mehta (Legoktm)
• Michał Buczyński (Aegis Maelstrom)
• Mike Peel (Mike Peel)

You may see more information about the Results and Statistics of this Board election.

Please take a moment to appreciate the Affiliate Representatives and Analysis Committee members for taking part in this process and helping to grow the Board of Trustees in capacity and diversity. These hours of volunteer work connect us across understanding and perspective. Thank you for your participation.

Thank you to the community members who put themselves forward as candidates for the Board of Trustees. Considering joining the Board of Trustees is no small decision. The time and dedication candidates have shown to this point speaks to their commitment to this movement. Congratulations to those candidates who have been selected. A great amount of appreciation and gratitude for those candidates not selected. Please continue to share your leadership with Wikimedia.

Thank you to those who followed the Affiliate process for this Board election. You may review the results of the Affiliate selection process.

The next part of the Board election process is the community voting period. You may view the Board election timeline here. To prepare for the community voting period, there are several things community members can engage with in the following ways:

• Read candidates’ statements and read the candidates’ answers to the questions posed by the Affiliate Representatives.
• Propose and select the 6 questions for candidates to answer during their video Q&A.
• See the Analysis Committee’s ratings of candidates on each candidate’s statement.
• Propose statements for the Election Compass voters can use to find which candidates best fit their principles.
• Encourage others in your community to take part in the election.

Best,

Movement Strategy and Governance

This message was sent on behalf of the Board Selection Task Force and the Elections Committee

MNadzikiewicz (WMF) 16:03, 27 uztaila 2022 (CEST)

Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 7, July-September 2022Read the full newsletter

---

Welcome to the 7th issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News! The newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the implementation of Wikimedia's Movement Strategy recommendations, other relevant topics regarding Movement governance, as well as different projects and activities supported by the Movement Strategy and Governance (MSG) team of the Wikimedia Foundation.

The MSG Newsletter is delivered quarterly, while the more frequent Movement Strategy Weekly will be delivered weekly. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive future issues of this newsletter.

• Movement sustainability: Wikimedia Foundation's annual sustainability report has been published. (continue reading)
• Improving user experience: recent improvements on the desktop interface for Wikimedia projects. (continue reading)
• Safety and inclusion: updates on the revision process of the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines. (continue reading)
• Equity in decisionmaking: reports from Hubs pilots conversations, recent progress from the Movement Charter Drafting Committee, and a new white paper for futures of participation in the Wikimedia movement. (continue reading)
• Stakeholders coordination: launch of a helpdesk for Affiliates and volunteer communities working on content partnership. (continue reading)
• Leadership development: updates on leadership projects by Wikimedia movement organizers in Brazil and Cape Verde. (continue reading)
• Internal knowledge management: launch of a new portal for technical documentation and community resources. (continue reading)
• Innovate in free knowledge: high-quality audiovisual resources for scientific experiments and a new toolkit to record oral transcripts. (continue reading)
• Evaluate, iterate, and adapt: results from the Equity Landscape project pilot (continue reading)
• Other news and updates: a new forum to discuss Movement Strategy implementation, upcoming Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees election, a new podcast to discuss Movement Strategy, and change of personnel for the Foundation's Movement Strategy and Governance team. (continue reading)

Thank you for reading! RamzyM (WMF) 03:37, 18 uztaila 2022 (CEST)

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.

Hizkuntza gehiago • Mesedez, lagun gaitzazu zure hizkuntzara itzultzen

Hi all,

Community members in the 2022 Board of Trustees election are invited to propose statements to use in the Election Compass.

An Election Compass is a tool to help voters select the candidates that best align with their beliefs and views. The community members will propose statements for the candidates to answer using a Lickert scale (agree/neutral/disagree). The candidates’ answers to the statements will be loaded into the Election Compass tool. Voters will use the tool by entering in their answer to the statements (agree/disagree/neutral). The results will show the candidates that best align with the voter’s beliefs and views.

Here is the timeline for the Election Compass

• July 8 - 20: Community members propose statements for the Election Compass
• July 21 - 22: Elections Committee reviews statements for clarity and removes off-topic statements
• July 23 - August 1: Volunteers vote on the statements
• August 2 - 4: Elections Committee selects the top 15 statements
• August 5 - 12: candidates align themselves with the statements
• August 15: The Election Compass opens for voters to use to help guide their voting decision

The Elections Committee will select the top 15 statements at the beginning of August. The Elections Committee will oversee the process, supported by the Movement Strategy and Governance team. MSG will check that the questions are clear, there are no duplicates, no typos, and so on.

Best,

Movement Strategy and Governance

This message was sent on behalf of the Board Selection Task Force and the Elections Committee

MNadzikiewicz (WMF) (talk) 13:34, 14 uztaila 2022 (CEST)

Arratsalde on denoi!

Orain arte xingola edo lazo urdinak ez du izan artikulurik gurean, eta bitxia ere bazen. 40 urtez gorakoek askotariko bizipenak izango zenituzten ikur honekin. Nahi duenak hor du informazio gehiago sartzen joateko, une honetan motz. Goraintzi

Welcome to the twenty-first newsletter from the Growth team!

New project: Positive reinforcement

Mockup of the Impact module, redesigned to add Positive reinforcement.

• The Growth team started a new project: Positive reinforcement. We want newcomers to understand there is an interest in regularly editing Wikipedia, and we want to improve new editor retention.
• We asked users from Arabic, Bangla, Czech and French Wikipedia about their feedback. Some people participated at mediawiki.org as well.
• We summarized the initial feedback gathered from these community discussions, along with how we plan to iterate based on that feedback.
• The first Positive Reinforcement idea is a redesign of the impact module: incorporating stats, graphs, and other contribution information. This idea received the widest support, and we plan to start our work based on the design illustrated on the side.
• Please let us know what you think of this project, in any language.

For mentors

• We have worked on two new features, to inform them about the mentorship:
  • In the Mentor module, we now provide more information about the public nature of the mentors/newcomer relationship and the fact that talk pages are public.
  • We now allow newcomers to opt-in and opt-out of mentorship.

Scaling

• "Add a link" available at more wikis ― Add a link feature has been deployed to more wikis: Catalan Wikipedia, Hebrew Wikipedia, Hindi Wikipedia, Korean Wikipedia, Norwegian Bokmål Wikipedia, Portuguese Wikipedia, Simple English Wikipedia, Swedish Wikipedia, Ukrainian Wikipedia, Abkhazian Wikipedia, Achinese Wikipedia, Adyghe Wikipedia, Afrikaans Wikipedia, Akan Wikipedia, Alemannisch Wikipedia, Amharic Wikipedia, Aragonese Wikipedia, Old English Wikipedia, Aramaic Wikipedia, Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia, Asturian Wikipedia, Atikamekw Wikipedia, Avaric Wikipedia, Aymara Wikipedia, Azerbaijani Wikipedia, South Azerbaijani Wikipedia. This is part of the progressive deployment of this tool to more Wikipedias. The communities can configure locally how this feature works.
• "Add an image" available at more wikis ― Add an image feature will be deployed to more wikis: Greek Wikipedia, Indonesian Wikipedia, Polish Wikipedia, Chinese Wikipedia. These communities will be able to configure locally how this feature works.

Suggested edits

• Selecting topics ― We have created an "AND" filter to the list of topics at Special:Homepage. This way, newcomers can decide to select very specific topics ("Transportation" AND "Asia") or to have a broader selection ("Transportation" OR "Asia"). At the moment this feature is tested at pilot wikis.
• Changes for Add a link ― We have built several improvements that came from community discussion and from data analysis. They will be available soon at the wikis.
  • Algorithm improvements ― The algorithm now avoids recommending links in sections that usually don't have links and for first names. Also, it now limits each article to only having three link suggestions by default (limited to the highest accuracy suggestions of all the available ones in the article).
  • User experience improvements ― We added a confirmation dialog when a user exits out of suggestion mode prior to making changes. We also improved post-edit dialog experience and allow newcomers to browse through task suggestions from the post-edit dialog.
  • Community configuration ― We allow communities to set a maximum number of links per article via Special:EditGrowthConfig.
  • Future change for Add a link feature ― We will suggest underlinked articles in priority.
• Patrolling suggested edits ― Some users at Arabic Wikipedia, Spanish Wikipedia, and Russian Wikipedia told us that "Add a link" and "Add an image" edits can be challenging to patrol. We are now brainstorming improvements to help address this challenge. We have already some ideas and we started some work to address this challenge. If you have any thoughts to add about the challenges of reviewing these tasks or how we should improve these tasks further, please let us know, in any language.

Community configuration

Communities can configure how the features work, using Special:EditGrowthConfig.

• Communities can set the maximum number of "add an image" suggested tasks a newcomer can complete daily.
• Future change: allow communities to customize the "add a link" quality gate threshold easily, using Special:EditGrowthConfig.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:03, 5 uztaila 2022 (CEST)

Kaixo,

Asteburuan EHZn pintxatu duen DJ Txako inguruko artikulu bat sortzen nebillen eta informazio gehigarria bildu eta artikulua osatzera itzuli nahizenean artikulua ezabatuta zegoela ikusi dut. Jakin liteke zein izan den horren arrazoia? @Lainobeltz

Mila esker!

Aupa @Bixintxo:

spam marka jarri diotelako ezabatu dut. Berreskuratu dut. Agian ondo letorke erreferentziaren bat jartzea, artikuluan dioen munduan zehar lan egin eta bira ugari egin ditu artista handiekin bezalako esaldiak egiaztatzeko.

Ondo izan

Gabon,

Mila esker, berreskuratu izanagatik. Nire kontu erreferentzia hori zuzentzea eta datu gehigarri batzuk sartzea. Artikulu nahiko sinplea izango den arren interesgarria iruditu zait pertsonaia.

Mila esker eta ondo izan

Edit: berant ikusi dut erantzuna zela

Nolanahi ere, kontua da batzuetan autorreferentziak direla eta beste batzuetan egiaztatu gabeko esaldiak. Hemen doa gure politika erreferentzien gainean. Autoren blogak ez dira erreferentzia.

Kaixo @Iñaki LL,

Jakin badakit ez direla erreferentziatze egokienak baina DJ Japoniar bati buruzko erreferentzia ugari aurkitzea ere ez da kontu xamurra. Ahal izan ditudan erreferentzia txukunenak erabili ditut. Artikuluaren informazioren bat fidagaitza dela baderitzozu, ez izan zalantzarik aldatu, hobetu, zein ezabatzen. Horretan datza azken finean Wikipediak ez?

Hala ere, eskertzen da erreferentzien politika orrirako lotura.

Bixintxo, garbiketa bat egin dut, info gehiena utzi dudan arren. Egiaztapen guztiak nahiko mugakoak dira, DJaren izena aipatzen duten egitarauak eta antzekoak.

Artikuluaren protagonistaren webgunea edo bloga ezin dugu hartu informazioak emateko iturritzat. Are, informazio hori ez da entziklopedikoa, WP ez da zerrenda bat, ezta agenda bat. Beste lankide batzuekiko begirunea ere bada, estandarrak guztientzat berdinak dira. Goraintzi